COMPARISON · OSCILLOSCOPES

HANMATEK HO52 vs OWON HDS272S

The HANMATEK HO52 vs OWON HDS272S choice is between two pocket-sized scope-meters whose published specs line up almost row for row: two channels, 250 MSa/s on one channel and 125 MSa/s on two, an 8K record, a 3.5-inch 320 × 240 screen and a 20,000-count true-RMS multimeter. The OWON adds two things: 70 MHz of bandwidth instead of 50 MHz, and a single-channel signal generator. Here is when those two extras are worth paying for.

By the OhmSavvy Research Team ·

Disclosure: OhmSavvy earns a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases made through these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded.

HANMATEK HO52 handheld two-channel oscilloscope and multimeter, front view
Best Budget Handheld + Meter

HANMATEK HO52

4.1★★★★☆

A low-cost two-channel 50 MHz handheld scope with a built-in 20,000-count multimeter.

OWON HDS272S handheld oscilloscope with multimeter and signal generator, front view
Best 70 MHz 3-in-1 Handheld

OWON HDS272S

4.2★★★★☆

A two-channel 70 MHz handheld with a 20,000-count meter and a 25 MHz signal generator.

Specs side by side

HANMATEK HO52OWON HDS272S
Rating4.1★★★★☆4.2★★★★☆
Bandwidth50MHz70MHz
Channels22
Sample rate250 MSa/s (1 ch); 125 MSa/s (2 ch)250 MSa/s (1 ch); 125 MSa/s (2 ch)
Best forField checks that need a scope and a meter on a budgetPortable work that needs a scope, meter and signal source
Record length8K (1 ch); 4K (2 ch)8K (datasheet: 8K or 4K optional)
Vertical resolutionNot stated by HANMATEK8-bit
Rise time7 ns or less5 ns or less
Signal generatorNone (the HO52S has one)1 channel: sine to 25 MHz, square and pulse to 5 MHz, 14-bit
Multimeter20,000-count true RMS; 1000 V DC, 750 V AC, 10 A20,000-count true RMS; 1000 V DC, 750 V AC, 10 A
Display3.5-inch, 320 × 2403.5-inch, 320 × 240
Trigger typesEdge (auto, normal, single)Edge (auto, normal, single)
Automatic measurements77
Scope input limit400 V (DC + AC peak-to-peak)400 V (DC + AC peak-to-peak)
Battery2 × 2200 mAh; about 4 hours2 × 2200 mAh 18650; 3 to 6 hours
Charging5 V 2 A over USB (Amazon listing: USB-C, power bank)5 V 2 A over USB-C; works from a power bank
Size; weight without battery199 × 100 × 39 mm; about 0.6 kg198 × 96 × 38 mm; about 0.6 kg

Specs checked against manufacturer documentation and official Amazon listings. Desk research, not bench testing. How we research.

Key differences

  • →Bandwidth is 70 MHz on the HDS272S and 50 MHz on the HO52, and OWON quotes a faster rise time (5 ns or less against 7 ns or less).
  • →Sampling is the same on paper: 250 MSa/s with one channel and 125 MSa/s with both, so the HDS272S's extra bandwidth is most useful in single-channel mode.
  • →Only the HDS272S has a signal generator: one channel, sine up to 25 MHz and square or pulse up to 5 MHz, 14-bit, up to 2.5 Vpp into 50 Ω. On HANMATEK's side that output is reserved for the HO52S.
  • →The multimeters match on the numbers both makers publish: 20,000 counts, true RMS, 1000 V DC, 750 V AC and 10 A.
  • →OWON states 8-bit vertical resolution; HANMATEK doesn't publish the HO52's ADC resolution. The HO52 halves its record to 4K with both channels on; OWON lists 8K, with 4K as an option.
  • →Neither carries our Hands-on Tested badge. The HDS272S is rated 4.2 in our roundup and the HO52 4.1.

Spec by spec

Put the two manuals side by side and most rows read the same: 5 ns/div to 1000 s/div timebase, 10 mV/div to 10 V/div, 10,000 waveforms per second, a 20 MHz bandwidth limit, 1 MΩ inputs and an edge trigger. The charts below cover the rows that actually differ, plus the sampling figures that are worth seeing next to the bandwidth numbers.

HANMATEK HO52
50 MHz
OWON HDS272S
70 MHz
Rated analog bandwidth (−3 dB). The OWON is 40% wider.
HANMATEK HO52
≤ 7 ns
OWON HDS272S
≤ 5 ns
Published rise time; shorter is better. Both figures are maker maximums.
HO52, 1 channel
250 MSa/s
HDS272S, 1 channel
250 MSa/s
HO52, 2 channels
125 MSa/s
HDS272S, 2 channels
125 MSa/s
Sample rate per model, one and two channels. The figures are identical, which caps how much the extra bandwidth helps.
HO52 (about)
~4 h
HDS272S (low end)
3 h
HDS272S (high end)
6 h
Battery runtime as each maker quotes it. OWON gives a range rather than one figure.

Two source notes. OWON's web spec table is misaligned and appears to put 500 MSa/s under the HDS272S; OWON's PDF datasheet and the Amazon listing both give 250 MSa/s, which is what we use. And the Amazon listing mentions a 4400 mAh battery good for about 6 hours, while OWON specifies two 2200 mAh 18650 cells and 3 to 6 hours. HANMATEK, for its part, doesn't state the HO52's converter resolution at all.

Which should you buy?

Buyer or jobBetter fitWhy
Checking a car sensor or relay coil plus battery voltageHANMATEK HO52Scope and meter cover it; a generator adds nothing
Testing a guitar pedal or small amplifier stageOWON HDS272SIts generator supplies the input sine for CH1 and CH2
Looking at PWM on a motor driver or LED dimmerEitherKilohertz signals sit far inside 50 MHz
Single-channel look at a 10 to 15 MHz clockOWON HDS272S70 MHz keeps that clock's shape better than 50 MHz
Simulating a sensor pulse to check firmwareOWON HDS272SPulse and arbitrary output up to 5 MHz
Lowest-cost scope plus meter for a toolbagHANMATEK HO52Same meter numbers, no generator to pay for
Measuring a resonant sensor or filter responseOWON HDS272SSweep the generator sine and watch the output

What 50 MHz and 70 MHz handhelds can measure

The usual rule is to buy three to five times more bandwidth than the highest frequency you want to see with its shape intact. That puts the HO52's comfortable range at roughly 10 to 17 MHz and the HDS272S's at roughly 14 to 23 MHz. Either covers audio, servo and PWM signals, switching regulators in the hundreds of kilohertz, UART and I2C, and the clocks on most 8-bit and many 32-bit hobby boards. Our bandwidth explainer shows where the rule comes from.

Sampling is the part buyers skip. With both channels on, each one gets 125 MSa/s, which is 2.5 samples per cycle of a 50 MHz sine and fewer than two for 70 MHz. Nyquist says two samples per cycle is the bare minimum, and a readable waveform needs several more. So on either handheld, two-channel work is limited by sampling long before the front-end bandwidth matters, and the HDS272S's extra 20 MHz pays off mainly when one channel is running at 250 MSa/s. See what GSa/s means for more on the trade-off.

CH2 slowerCH1 fasterillustrative
Illustration: the same fast-edged square wave on CH1 (green, a quicker front end) and CH2 (blue, a slower one). The slower response rounds the corners and stretches the measured rise time.

Where the rise-time gap shows

A common estimate is that the rise time you see is the square root of the signal's rise time squared plus the scope's rise time squared. For a 10 ns edge, a 7 ns scope shows about 12 ns and a 5 ns scope about 11 ns. For a 100 ns edge the two readings are practically the same. The gap only matters on fast logic.

Short records, short windows

An 8K record at 250 MSa/s spans about 33 µs. Stretch the timebase to catch a slower event and both scopes must drop their sample rate to fit it in 8K points, so zooming into an edge afterwards shows little detail. Neither handheld is the tool for long captures.

Both stop at an edge trigger and seven automatic measurements (period, frequency, mean, peak-to-peak, max, min and amplitude), and neither maker lists serial decoding. If you need to trigger on a pulse width or decode I2C, a bench scope such as the ones in HANMATEK DOS1102 vs Hantek DSO2C10 is the better tool.

Is the HDS272S generator worth having?

A scope only watches. Plenty of field jobs need nothing more: a crank sensor, a fan's tach line, the ripple on a supply. The generator becomes useful the moment the circuit under test has no signal of its own. With the HDS272S you can set a 1 kHz sine at a few hundred millivolts, feed it into a preamp, probe the input on CH1 and the output on CH2, and read the gain straight off the two amplitudes. Raise the level until the output flattens and you have found its clipping point; sweep the frequency and you can see a filter roll off.

OWON's figures set the limits: sine from 0.1 Hz to 25 MHz, square and pulse to 5 MHz, ramp to 1 MHz, arbitrary shapes to 5 MHz, and up to 2.5 Vpp into 50 Ω. That is ample for audio, sensor simulation and logic inputs, but it is not a lab function generator: you get one output, and it can't source more than a few volts. If you would use it only now and then, the HO52 plus a cheap standalone generator is another route; if you want everything in one bag, the HDS272S is the tidier kit.

Voltage limits on a handheld

The meter section is rated to 1000 V DC and 750 V AC, but each scope input is limited to 400 V (DC plus AC peak-to-peak) at the connector, and 230 V mains alone swings about 650 V peak-to-peak. Use the meter for mains voltage, use a probe rated for the job before putting a scope channel near line voltage, and assume the two channel grounds are tied together, since neither maker lists isolated channels. Don't leave the unit on its USB charger while probing mains-connected equipment.

Related comparisons

Neither handheld has a full review yet; both are ranked in our beginner oscilloscope roundup. For a 200 MHz handheld with the same three-instrument layout, read OWON HDS2202S vs FNIRSI DSO152; for other scope-meter combinations see Hantek 2D72 vs FNIRSI 2C53T and FNIRSI 2C53T vs FNIRSI 1014D. New to the specs? Start with the oscilloscope buying guide.

Choose the HANMATEK HO52 if…

  • ✓You want a scope and a 20,000-count meter in one pocket tool and won't need to inject a test signal
  • ✓Most of what you probe is audio, PWM, sensor outputs or slow serial lines well under 10 MHz
  • ✓Spending less matters more than the last 20 MHz of bandwidth

Choose the OWON HDS272S if…

  • ✓You need a known sine or square wave to feed a circuit while you watch its output
  • ✓You care about sharper edge readings: OWON quotes a rise time of 5 ns or less versus HANMATEK's 7 ns
  • ✓You want 8-bit resolution stated by the maker and a fold-out stand for bench use

Neither if…

You need to put a scope channel on mains voltage: each one's scope input is limited to 400 V DC plus AC peak-to-peak at the connector, well under what 230 V mains swings to, and neither maker lists isolated channels — use the multimeter section for mains voltage on either unit instead.

The bottom line

These two handhelds share a sample rate, screen, record length and multimeter specification, so the decision comes down to two extras. Pick the OWON HDS272S if you will use its 25 MHz generator or want 70 MHz and a quicker rise time for single-channel work on faster logic. Pick the HANMATEK HO52 if you only need to watch signals and take meter readings, since it covers that for less.

Frequently asked questions

Is the OWON HDS272S just the HANMATEK HO52 with a generator?+

Not quite. The published specs match closely: two channels, 250 MSa/s on one channel and 125 MSa/s on two, a 3.5-inch 320 x 240 screen and a 20,000-count meter. But the HDS272S is rated at 70 MHz instead of 50 MHz, quotes a 5 ns rather than 7 ns rise time, and adds a 25 MHz signal generator.

Does the extra 20 MHz of the HDS272S make a real difference?+

Sometimes. With one channel at 250 MSa/s, 70 MHz keeps clocks in the 10 to 20 MHz range looking more square. With both channels on, each samples at 125 MSa/s on both scopes, so sampling rather than bandwidth sets the limit. For audio, PWM and slow serial lines, 50 MHz is already plenty.

Can the HANMATEK HO52 output a test signal?+

No. HANMATEK's manual lists the arbitrary waveform generator as an option fitted only to the HO52S. The plain HO52 is a two-channel scope plus a multimeter. If you want a signal output in a HANMATEK handheld, look for the HO52S variant instead, or choose the OWON HDS272S, which includes one.

Can I measure mains voltage with these handheld scope-meters?+

Use the multimeter section, rated to 750 V AC and 1000 V DC on both. Each scope input is limited to 400 V DC plus AC peak-to-peak at the connector, which 230 V mains exceeds. Neither maker lists isolated channels, so treat the probe grounds as common and use a properly rated probe for any line-voltage waveform.

Which handheld runs longer on a charge?+

HANMATEK quotes about 4 hours for the HO52 from two 2200 mAh cells. OWON quotes 3 to 6 hours for the HDS272S from two 2200 mAh 18650 cells, and says it charges over USB-C and from a power bank. Runtime depends on use, so treat both as rough figures.

Related

See all beginner oscilloscope picksOscilloscope buying guideWhat is oscilloscope bandwidth?What does GSa/s mean?HANMATEK DOS1102 vs Hantek DSO2C10FNIRSI 1013D Plus vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO2D15 vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek 1008B vs Hantek 6022BEMINIWARE DS213 vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI 1014D vs FNIRSI DSO-TC3FNIRSI 2C53T vs FNIRSI 1014DFNIRSI DSO-TC3 vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek 6022BEFNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek DSO2D10FNIRSI DSO152 vs Siglent SDS1104X-EHantek 2D72 vs FNIRSI 2C53THantek 6022BE vs Hantek DSO2D10Hantek DSO2C10 vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO2C10 vs Hantek DSO2D10Hantek DSO2D10 vs Siglent SDS1104X-EHantek DSO5102P vs Rigol DHO804OWON HDS2202S vs FNIRSI DSO152OWON VDS1022I vs Hantek 6022BEPicoScope 2204A vs Digilent Analog Discovery 3PicoScope 2204A vs Hantek 6022BEPicoScope 2206B vs Hantek 6022BERigol DHO802 vs FNIRSI DSO152Rigol DHO802 vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DHO802 vs Rigol DS1054ZRigol DHO804 vs FNIRSI 1014DRigol DHO804 vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DHO804 vs Rigol DS1054ZRigol DHO804 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DHO804 vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DHO914 vs Rigol DHO804Rigol DHO914S vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1054Z vs FNIRSI DSO152Rigol DS1054Z vs Hantek 6022BERigol DS1054Z vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DS1054Z vs Hantek DSO5102PRigol DS1054Z vs OWON SDS1102Rigol DS1054Z vs OWON VDS1022IRigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DS1102Z-E vs Siglent SDS1102CML+Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus vs Siglent SDS1104X-ESiglent SDS1104X-E vs Hantek DSO5102PSiglent SDS1104X-E vs Rigol DHO802Siglent SDS1104X-E vs Siglent SDS1202X-ESiglent SDS1202X-E vs Hantek DSO2D10OWON HDS2202S vs HANMATEK HO52OWON HDS272S vs FNIRSI 2C53T

More oscilloscope guides and reviews

Product reviews

View all 4 reviews →