COMPARISON · OSCILLOSCOPES

Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus vs Siglent SDS1104X-E

The Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus vs Siglent SDS1104X-E decision is between two scopes with the same headline: four channels, 100 MHz and 1 GSa/s. The Rigol builds in a two-channel 25 MHz signal generator. The Siglent keeps twice the Rigol's sample rate per channel when all four inputs are on, refreshes its display faster and includes CAN and LIN decoding as standard. Which matters more depends on whether you need to create signals or catch them.

By the OhmSavvy Research Team ·

Disclosure: OhmSavvy earns a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases made through these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded.

Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus four-channel oscilloscope with built-in signal generator, front view
Best 4-Channel Scope + Generator

Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus

4.5★★★★★

A four-channel 100 MHz classic with a two-channel 25 MHz signal generator built in.

Siglent SDS1104X-E four-channel digital oscilloscope, front view
Best for Growing IntoHands-on Tested

Siglent SDS1104X-E

4.8★★★★★

More bandwidth and a better UI than the Rigol, for projects that will get more demanding.

Specs side by side

Rigol DS1104Z-S PlusSiglent SDS1104X-E
Rating4.5★★★★★4.8★★★★★
Bandwidth100MHz100MHz
Channels44
Sample rate1 GSa/s (1 ch); 250 MSa/s (4 ch)1 GSa/s
Best forFour-channel work that also needs two signal sourcesIntermediate hobbyists, future-proofing
Sample rate, all 4 channels on250 MSa/s per channel500 MSa/s per channel
Memory depth24 Mpts (1 ch) per Rigol datasheet; Rigol series page says 12 Mpts standard, 24 Mpts optional14 Mpts interleaved; 7 Mpts per channel
Waveform update rateUp to 30,000 wfm/s100,000 wfm/s (400,000 in sequence mode)
Serial decodingRS232/UART, I2C, SPI (Rigol series page lists decoding as optional)I2C, SPI, UART/RS232, CAN, LIN as standard
Built-in generator2 channels, 25 MHz, 200 MSa/s, 14-bitNone (USB AWG is an option)
Logic channels16 with RPL1116 kit, sold separately16 with MSO option
Vertical resolution8-bit8-bit
Display7-inch, 800 × 4807-inch, 800 × 480
Power100–240 V AC, 50 W max100–240 V AC, 50 W max

Specs checked against manufacturer documentation and official Amazon listings. Siglent SDS1104X-E is hands-on tested by OhmSavvy; the Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus assessment is desk research. How we research.

Key differences

  • →The Rigol has a two-channel, 25 MHz signal generator built in (200 MSa/s, 14-bit); the Siglent has no generator unless you add its optional USB AWG.
  • →With three or four channels running, the Siglent samples each at 500 MSa/s against the Rigol's 250 MSa/s.
  • →Siglent states 100,000 waveforms per second (400,000 in sequence mode); Rigol states up to 30,000.
  • →Siglent lists I2C, SPI, UART, CAN and LIN decoding as standard. Rigol lists RS232/UART, I2C and SPI, and its own series page marks decoding as optional.
  • →Rigol's sources conflict on memory: 24 Mpts standard in the datasheet, 12 Mpts standard with 24 Mpts optional on the series page. Siglent states 14 Mpts interleaved, 7 Mpts per channel.
  • →Bandwidth (100 MHz), channel count, peak sample rate (1 GSa/s), 8-bit resolution and the 7-inch 800 × 480 screen are the same on both.

Spec by spec

Put the two spec sheets side by side and the first lines match exactly, so the useful comparison starts lower down. The numbers that separate them are how the 1 GSa/s converter is shared out when you turn on more channels, how many waveforms per second each one draws, and how much acquisition memory sits behind the screen. Each chart below uses only figures published by Rigol and Siglent.

Rigol, 1 channel
1 GSa/s
Rigol, 2 channels
500 MSa/s
Rigol, 3–4 channels
250 MSa/s
Siglent, max
1 GSa/s
Siglent, all 4 on
500 MSa/s
Sample rate per channel as more inputs are switched on. Both start at 1 GSa/s; with all four on, the Siglent keeps twice the Rigol's rate.
Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus
30,000 wfm/s
Siglent SDS1104X-E
100,000 wfm/s
Siglent, sequence mode
400,000 wfm/s

Bars use a logarithmic scale: each step is ten times the last.

Waveform update rate, log scale. More waveforms per second means a rare glitch is more likely to reach the screen.
Rigol, per datasheet
24 Mpts
Rigol, series page (std)
12 Mpts
Siglent, interleaved
14 Mpts
Siglent, per channel
7 Mpts
Maximum memory depth. Rigol's own documents give two different standard figures, so both are shown.
FeatureRigolSiglent
Signal generator2 ch, 25 MHzOptional USB AWG
CAN / LIN decodeNot listedStandard
I2C / SPI / UART decodeListed; optional per series pageStandard
16 logic channelsRPL1116 kitMSO option
Built-in extras as each maker lists them.

Which should you buy?

Think about the jobs you will actually do in your first year with the scope, then read across.

Buyer or jobBetter fitWhy
Frequency response of filters and audio stagesRigol DS1104Z-S PlusGenerator drives the input while two channels watch input and output
Testing a circuit that needs two separate stimulus signalsRigol DS1104Z-S PlusTwo independent 25 MHz generator channels
SPI bus with clock, chip select and two data linesSiglent SDS1104X-EAll four channels at 500 MSa/s each
Car and industrial networks (CAN, LIN)Siglent SDS1104X-ECAN and LIN decoding listed as standard
Hunting an intermittent glitchSiglent SDS1104X-E100,000 wfm/s against 30,000
Long captures on one channelCheck bothRigol's memory figure depends on which Rigol document you trust
Single-signal work under about 20 MHzEitherSame 100 MHz bandwidth and 1 GSa/s single-channel rate

Generator or faster sampling: what each one can and can't do

Both scopes are rated at 100 MHz. Bandwidth is the frequency at which a sine wave reads about 3 dB low, around 70% of its real amplitude, and the usual 3–5x rule says the rating should be three to five times the highest frequency you care about. On that basis both handle signals up to roughly 20–33 MHz with one channel on: microcontroller clocks, PWM, UART, I2C, most hobby SPI and the switching frequency of common converters. Square waves need the lower end of that range because their edges are built from harmonics. Our explainer on oscilloscope bandwidth covers the rule properly.

The catch is that bandwidth assumes enough samples. Nyquist sets the bare minimum at two samples per cycle of the highest frequency present; in practice scopes want several. With all four channels on, the Rigol drops to 250 MSa/s per channel, which is only 2.5 samples per cycle of a 100 MHz sine. The Siglent's 500 MSa/s gives five. Both draw an interpolated trace between samples, so the display looks smoother than raw dots, but interpolation cannot recover detail between samples that were never taken. If your four-channel work stays below about 25 MHz the gap is unlikely to show; if you want the full 100 MHz on four inputs at once, the Siglent keeps more sampling margin. For more on how sample rate and bandwidth interact, see what GSa/s means.

real signal (faint) · samples + displayed trace (yellow)
Illustration: 2.5 samples per cycle, the Rigol's four-channel rate on a 100 MHz sine, joined with straight lines.
real signal (faint) · samples + displayed trace (yellow)
Illustration: 5 samples per cycle, the Siglent's four-channel rate on the same signal.

The Rigol's answer is its generator, and it is a real one. Two outputs at up to 25 MHz, 200 MSa/s and 14-bit cover most bench stimulus jobs: sweep a sine into an active filter and watch the output fall away, feed a square wave into a comparator, or use the second output as a separate clock or enable signal while the first supplies the test waveform. You still have four scope inputs free to watch the result. Doing the same on the Siglent means buying either a separate function generator or Siglent's optional USB AWG.

On digital buses the Siglent pulls ahead. CAN and LIN decoding is listed as standard, which matters for automotive and industrial projects, and its 100,000 waveforms per second (400,000 in sequence mode) means less dead time between captures when you are waiting for a rare fault. Rigol lists RS232/UART, I2C and SPI decoding for the DS1000Z family, but its series page marks decoding as an option, so confirm what is enabled on the unit you buy before relying on it.

The memory question, stated plainly

Rigol's datasheet lists 24 Mpts standard on one channel (12 Mpts on two, 6 Mpts on three or four). Its series page says 12 Mpts standard with 24 Mpts as an option. We can't settle that from Rigol's own material, so we don't score it either way. Siglent states 14 Mpts interleaved and 7 Mpts per channel. With all four channels on, the two figures are close even if the datasheet is right.

Mains and high-voltage measurements

Both are mains-powered bench scopes, so each probe's ground clip is normally tied to mains earth. Clipping it to a mains-referenced point can cause a short circuit. Use a differential probe or a properly set-up isolation arrangement for anything connected to the mains.

Where they sit among our other picks

The Siglent rates 4.8 in our beginner oscilloscope roundup and the Rigol 4.5; the Siglent carries our Hands-on Tested badge and the Rigol does not. If you want the Siglent's strengths explained in more depth, read our Siglent SDS1104X-E review. The 50 MHz, generator-free sibling of the Rigol is covered in Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-E, and a two-channel scope-plus-generator alternative in Hantek DSO2D10 vs Siglent SDS1104X-E. For a 12-bit route with a generator, see Rigol DHO914S vs Siglent SDS1104X-E. The oscilloscope buying guide explains each spec from scratch.

Choose the Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus if…

  • ✓You need two test signals as well as four scope channels, and want one instrument on the bench
  • ✓Your tests involve driving a circuit and watching how it responds, such as filters, amplifiers or comparators
  • ✓You may add 16 logic channels later with Rigol's RPL1116 kit

Choose the Siglent SDS1104X-E if…

  • ✓You will often run three or four channels on fast signals and want 500 MSa/s on each
  • ✓You debug CAN or LIN buses, which Siglent decodes as standard
  • ✓You already own a function generator, or rarely need one

The bottom line

If you need to generate signals as well as measure them, the Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus saves buying a second instrument: two 25 MHz outputs alongside four 100 MHz channels. If you mostly debug existing circuits, the Siglent SDS1104X-E is the stronger scope: 500 MSa/s per channel with all four on, a faster update rate, CAN and LIN decoding as standard and clear memory figures. For most buyers without a generator need, the Siglent is the better buy.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus generator good enough to replace a separate function generator?+

For most hobby and education bench work, yes. It has two channels up to 25 MHz at 200 MSa/s and 14-bit, which covers sine sweeps into filters, square waves into logic and a second signal for clocks or enables. Work needing higher frequencies or more output channels still calls for a dedicated generator.

Why does the Siglent SDS1104X-E sample faster with four channels on?+

Siglent states 500 MSa/s per channel with all four inputs active, while Rigol gives 250 MSa/s per channel with three or four on. At 100 MHz that is five samples per cycle against 2.5, so the Siglent keeps more real detail on fast edges when every channel is in use.

How much memory does the Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus have?+

Rigol's documents disagree. The datasheet lists 24 Mpts standard on one channel, 12 Mpts on two and 6 Mpts on three or four. Rigol's series page says 12 Mpts standard with 24 Mpts optional. Check the configuration of the unit you are buying if long captures matter to you.

Which of these scopes decodes CAN bus?+

The Siglent SDS1104X-E. Siglent lists I2C, SPI, UART/RS232, CAN and LIN trigger and decode as standard. Rigol lists RS232/UART, I2C and SPI decoding for the DS1104Z-S Plus and does not list CAN or LIN, and its series page marks decoding as an option.

Can either scope add logic analyzer channels?+

Both can reach 16 digital channels, at extra cost. The Rigol DS1104Z-S Plus needs Rigol's RPL1116 logic probe kit, sold separately. Siglent offers 16 digital channels as an MSO option for its four-channel SDS1000X-E models. Neither includes logic channels out of the box.

Related

More oscilloscope guides and reviews

Product reviews

View all 4 reviews →