COMPARISON · OSCILLOSCOPES

Hantek 1008B vs Hantek 6022BE

Hantek 1008B vs Hantek 6022BE looks like a match between two screenless Hantek boxes that plug into a Windows PC, but the two were built for different work. The 1008B is an automotive tool: eight 12-bit channels, 2.4 MSa/s and 100kHz, with a crank and cam signal simulator. The 6022BE is a general electronics scope: two 8-bit channels, 48 MS/s and 20 MHz. Pick by the signals you plan to look at, not by the channel count.

By the OhmSavvy Research Team ·

Disclosure: OhmSavvy earns a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases made through these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded.

Hantek 1008B eight-channel automotive USB oscilloscope
Best 8-Channel Automotive USB Scope

Hantek 1008B

3.9★★★★☆

An eight-channel, 12-bit USB scope for slow automotive and sensor signals, run from a Windows PC.

Hantek 6022BE two-channel USB PC oscilloscope
Cheapest PC Scope

Hantek 6022BE

4.0★★★★☆

A very low-cost two-channel 20 MHz USB oscilloscope for learning on a Windows PC.

Specs side by side

Hantek 1008BHantek 6022BE
Rating3.9★★★★☆4.0★★★★☆
Bandwidth100kHz (per manual)20MHz
Channels82
Sample rate2.4 MSa/s (1 ch)48 MS/s (max)
Best forAutomotive sensor and actuator diagnostics on a laptopLearning scope basics on a Windows laptop for very little money
ADC resolution12-bit (4,096 levels)8-bit (256 levels)
Memory4K points (one channel)Not clearly stated by Hantek
Input couplingDC, 1 MΩDC only, 1 MΩ / 25 pF
Vertical range (x1 probe)10 mV/div to 5 V/div20 mV/div to 5 V/div
Maximum input400 V peak (DC + peak)Not stated by Hantek (diode-clamp protection listed)
TriggerEdge on any of CH1 to CH8; Auto, Normal, SingleRising or falling edge on CH1 or CH2; Auto, Normal, Single
Built-in output8-channel LVTTL square-wave generator, 0 to 250 kHzNone
SoftwareWindows 7/8/10, over 80 automotive test functionsWindows 10/8/7/NT/XP/Vista
PowerUSB 2.0 bus powerUSB 2.0 bus power
Size190 × 167 × 35 mm, 0.63 kg205 × 120 × 35 mm (weight not stated by Hantek)

Specs checked against manufacturer documentation and official Amazon listings. Desk research, not bench testing. How we research.

Key differences

  • →Purpose: the 1008B is sold as an automotive diagnostic scope with over 80 vehicle test functions in its software; the 6022BE is a plain general-purpose PC scope.
  • →Channels: eight analog inputs on the 1008B against two on the 6022BE.
  • →Speed: the 6022BE has 200 times the bandwidth (20 MHz against 100kHz) and 20 times the maximum sample rate (48 MS/s against 2.4 MSa/s with one channel on).
  • →Resolution: 12-bit on the 1008B against 8-bit on the 6022BE, so each vertical step is 16 times finer on the 1008B at the same volts-per-division setting.
  • →Signal output: the 1008B has eight square-wave outputs up to 250 kHz that can mimic crankshaft and camshaft sensors; the 6022BE has no generator.
  • →Unstated figures: Hantek gives neither model's per-channel sample rate with all channels running, and doesn't clearly assign a memory depth to the 6022BE.
  • →Ignition probe: Hantek's 1008B page lists a high-voltage ignition probe, but the kit photo on the Amazon listing we link doesn't show one. Check the box contents before you plan secondary-ignition work.
  • →Shared limits: both need a Windows PC, have no screen or battery, run from USB bus power and offer DC coupling only. Neither carries our Hands-on Tested badge.

Spec by spec

The charts split cleanly in two. On speed the 6022BE wins by more than an order of magnitude, so those bars use a log scale. On channel count and resolution the 1008B wins by a wide margin. Which half matters depends entirely on whether your signals are fast or numerous.

Hantek 6022BE
20 MHz
Hantek 1008B
100kHz

Bars use a logarithmic scale: each step is ten times the last.

Analog bandwidth, log scale. The 1008B's 100kHz figure appears in Hantek's manual, not on its product page.
Hantek 6022BE
48 MS/s
Hantek 1008B
2.4 MSa/s

Bars use a logarithmic scale: each step is ten times the last.

Maximum sample rate, log scale. Both are single-channel or maximum figures; Hantek gives no all-channels rate for either.
Hantek 1008B
8 channels
Hantek 6022BE
2 channels
Analog input channels: four times as many on the 1008B.
Hantek 1008B
4,096 levels (12-bit)
Hantek 6022BE
256 levels (8-bit)
Vertical levels from the converter: 12-bit gives 4,096 steps, 8-bit gives 256.

One more ratio is worth working out. Dividing each sample rate by its bandwidth gives 24 samples per cycle for the 1008B at 100kHz and 2.4 for the 6022BE at 20 MHz. The 1008B is slow, but it is sampled generously for its bandwidth, so a waveform near its limit still comes out with a recognizable shape. The 6022BE sits barely above the Nyquist floor at its rated bandwidth, so its practical ceiling for faithful waveform shape is a few MHz. See what GSa/s means and what oscilloscope bandwidth means for how the two numbers interact.

Which should you buy?

Buyer or jobPickOne-line reason
Checking crank and cam sensor sync on an engineHantek 1008BEight channels show both sensors plus others on one time base
Learning to use a scope with an Arduino kitHantek 6022BE20 MHz covers PWM, UART and I2C; the 1008B tops out at 100kHz
Bench-testing an ECU or tachometer input without an engineHantek 1008BIts square-wave outputs can simulate crankshaft and camshaft signals
Looking at a 400kHz I2C bus or a switching regulatorHantek 6022BEBoth sit far beyond the 1008B's bandwidth
Watching a slow sensor voltage drift by a few millivoltsHantek 1008B12-bit steps are 16 times finer than 8-bit at the same setting
Plotting the phase between two signalsHantek 6022BEHantek lists X-Y mode for it
A garage technician who wants guided testsHantek 1008BOver 80 automotive functions with reference waveforms and video help

Two different jobs: workshop or workbench

Bandwidth is the frequency at which a sine wave reads about 30% low. The usual advice is to buy three to five times the highest frequency you need to see, and more for square waves, whose edges carry harmonics far above the fundamental. Apply that rule and the two scopes land in very different places.

Hantek 1008B: many slow signals at once

With 100kHz bandwidth, the 1008B is comfortable up to roughly 20–33kHz. That sounds low until you look at what a car produces. Take a 60-tooth crank wheel with two missing teeth: at 6,000 rpm the engine turns 100 times a second, so the sensor sends about 6,000 pulses a second, comfortably inside that range. Cam sensors, wheel-speed sensors, throttle position, oxygen sensors and injector control signals are slower still or similar. The 1008B's real advantage is eight channels on one time base, so you can line up a crank signal against a cam signal and several injectors and see which event comes first. Twelve bits matter for analog sensors, where a small step in a slowly changing voltage is the fault. Its 4K-point memory is shallow, though, so long captures at a fast sample rate will run out of points.

Hantek 6022BE: two fast-enough channels for electronics

The 6022BE's 20 MHz suits signals up to roughly 4–7 MHz by the bandwidth rule, and the sample rate argues for the lower end of that. That covers what most hobby benches produce: microcontroller PWM, UART at common baud rates, 100kHz and 400kHz I2C, audio circuits and many small switching converters. It is the wrong tool in a car, though. Two channels can't show a crank, a cam and an injector together, it has no automotive test library, and Hantek doesn't give a maximum input voltage for it, only diode-clamp protection. Its 8-bit converter also makes small changes on a large signal harder to see than on the 1008B.

6022BE, 8-bit256 levels: 3 coarse steps1008B, 12-bit4,096 levels: 48 fine stepsDashed = true slow drift; solid = what each converter can record
Same volts-per-division setting on both, illustrative drift. A 12-bit step is 1/16 the height of an 8-bit step, so a change that moves the 6022BE's trace by three jumps moves the 1008B's by 48.

This is why resolution matters more in a car than its speed figure suggests. An oxygen sensor or throttle position signal that wanders by a few tens of millivolts can be the fault itself, and on an 8-bit trace that wander may show as a single jump or not at all. The 1008B records it as a gradual slope you can measure with cursors.

Why the generator outputs matter on the 1008B

Hantek lists eight LVTTL square-wave outputs on the 1008B, programmable from 0 to 250 kHz and able to simulate crankshaft and camshaft signals. That turns it into a stimulus as well as a scope: you can drive a tachometer, a module input or a training rig with a known pattern and watch the response on the input channels. Note the level is LVTTL, a low logic voltage, so check what the device under test expects before connecting. The 6022BE has no output of any kind.

Grounds and high voltage

On both scopes the probe grounds connect to the computer's ground, and through a desktop PC or a laptop on a grounded charger, to mains earth. In a car, running the laptop on its own battery avoids a ground path through the charger. Ignition secondaries run to thousands of volts: never connect a scope input to a spark plug lead directly, only through a proper capacitive ignition probe, and confirm one is in your kit, given the conflict noted above. The 1008B's 400 V peak rating is an input limit, not a safety category, and neither scope is meant for probing mains wiring.

What the two have in common

Neither box has a screen, controls or battery. Each draws its power from a USB 2.0 port and shows its traces in Hantek's Windows software: Windows 7, 8 and 10 for the 1008B, and Windows 10 back to XP for the 6022BE. Mac and Linux users should look elsewhere. Both inputs are DC-coupled at 1 MΩ, so a small ripple on a large DC level needs a blocking capacitor or careful offset to fill the screen. Physically they are close too: both are 35 mm deep, with the 1008B shorter and wider than the 6022BE.

If your interest is electronics rather than engines, the 6022BE has several other rivals worth reading: OWON VDS1022I vs Hantek 6022BE, PicoScope 2204A vs Hantek 6022BE and PicoScope 2206B vs Hantek 6022BE. For a scope with its own screen, see Hantek 6022BE vs Hantek DSO2D10 or the beginner oscilloscope picks, and the buying guide explains each spec in plain terms.

Choose the Hantek 1008B if…

  • ✓You diagnose cars and want several sensors on screen at once, such as crank, cam and injector signals
  • ✓You want built-in automotive test routines with reference waveforms rather than a blank scope
  • ✓You need to feed crankshaft or camshaft style square waves into an ECU input on the bench
  • ✓Your signals are slow but you care about small changes in level, where 12 bits help

Choose the Hantek 6022BE if…

  • ✓You work on Arduino, Raspberry Pi or hobby electronics rather than vehicles
  • ✓Your signals run from tens of kHz into the low MHz, past the 1008B's 100kHz ceiling
  • ✓Two channels are enough and you want X-Y mode for phase or Lissajous plots
  • ✓You want the cheaper of the two for learning how a scope works

Neither if…

You're on a Mac or Linux machine: Hantek lists Windows software only for both, and neither has a screen of its own, so without a Windows PC neither one displays anything — look for a model whose maker lists macOS support instead.

The bottom line

Buy the Hantek 1008B if you diagnose vehicles: eight 12-bit channels, guided automotive tests and a crank and cam simulator matter more there than speed, and 100kHz covers engine sensors. Buy the Hantek 6022BE for general electronics on a Windows laptop: 20 MHz and 48 MS/s handle hobby signals the 1008B can't, and two channels cover most bench jobs. Neither is a good substitute for the other.

Frequently asked questions

Can the Hantek 6022BE be used for car diagnostics?+

It can show a single slow sensor signal, since 20 MHz is far more bandwidth than engine sensors need. But it has only two channels, no automotive test library or reference waveforms, no signal simulator and no stated maximum input voltage. For timing several engine signals against each other, the 8-channel Hantek 1008B is the tool built for that job.

Is 100kHz bandwidth enough for automotive work?+

For most engine sensors, yes. A 60-tooth crank wheel at 6,000 rpm produces about 6kHz, well inside the 1008B's comfortable range of roughly 20 to 33kHz. It is not enough for in-vehicle networks such as CAN at common bit rates, which need far more bandwidth to show clean edges. Hantek states the 100kHz figure in its manual rather than on the product page.

Does the Hantek 1008B come with an ignition probe?+

Hantek's spec table, which is the same on its 1008A, 1008B and 1008C pages, lists one high-voltage ignition probe. The kit photo on the Amazon listing we link shows a case, eight test leads, a USB cable and one x10 probe, but no ignition probe. Confirm the contents with the seller if you need to look at secondary ignition.

Why does 12-bit resolution matter on the 1008B?+

A 12-bit converter splits the screen's vertical range into 4,096 levels, against 256 for the 6022BE's 8-bit converter. At the same volts-per-division setting, each step is 16 times smaller. That helps when the fault is a small change in a slowly moving voltage, such as a sensor signal that dips briefly, and matters less for fast logic signals.

Do either of these Hantek scopes work on a Mac?+

Hantek lists Windows software only for both: Windows 7, 8 and 10 for the 1008B, and Windows 10, 8, 7, NT, XP and Vista for the 6022BE. Neither has a screen of its own, so without a Windows PC neither will display anything. Mac users who want a USB scope should look at models whose makers list macOS support.

Related

See all beginner oscilloscope picksOscilloscope buying guideWhat is oscilloscope bandwidth?What does GSa/s mean?MINIWARE DS213 vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI 1013D Plus vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO2D15 vs FNIRSI 1014DHANMATEK HO52 vs OWON HDS272SHANMATEK DOS1102 vs Hantek DSO2C10FNIRSI 2C53T vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO2C10 vs FNIRSI 1014DPicoScope 2204A vs Hantek 6022BEFNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek 6022BEOWON VDS1022I vs Hantek 6022BEPicoScope 2206B vs Hantek 6022BEHantek 6022BE vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DS1054Z vs Hantek 6022BERigol DHO914 vs Rigol DHO804Rigol DHO914S vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1104Z-S Plus vs Siglent SDS1104X-EHantek DSO2C10 vs Hantek DSO2D10OWON HDS2202S vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI DSO-TC3 vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek DSO2D10FNIRSI DSO152 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1054Z vs FNIRSI DSO152Rigol DHO802 vs FNIRSI DSO152Hantek 2D72 vs FNIRSI 2C53TFNIRSI 1014D vs FNIRSI DSO-TC3Rigol DS1054Z vs OWON SDS1102Rigol DS1054Z vs OWON VDS1022IRigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DS1054Z vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DS1054Z vs Hantek DSO5102PRigol DHO802 vs Rigol DS1054ZRigol DHO802 vs Hantek DSO2D10Siglent SDS1104X-E vs Rigol DHO802Rigol DHO804 vs Rigol DS1054ZRigol DHO804 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DHO804 vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DHO804 vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DHO804 vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO5102P vs Rigol DHO804Hantek DSO2D10 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ESiglent SDS1202X-E vs Hantek DSO2D10Siglent SDS1104X-E vs Hantek DSO5102PSiglent SDS1104X-E vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DS1102Z-E vs Siglent SDS1102CML+PicoScope 2204A vs Digilent Analog Discovery 3

More oscilloscope guides and reviews

Product reviews

View all 4 reviews →