COMPARISON · OSCILLOSCOPES

MINIWARE DS213 vs FNIRSI DSO152

MINIWARE DS213 vs FNIRSI DSO152 compares two battery scopes that each fit in a shirt pocket but sit in different classes. The DS213 is a small mixed-signal instrument: two analog channels, two digital channels, 100 MSa/s and a built-in signal generator, with a 15 MHz bandwidth that only its Amazon listing states. The DSO152 is a single-channel 200kHz scope at 2.5 MSa/s, built to be the simplest way to see a waveform.

By the OhmSavvy Research Team ·

Disclosure: OhmSavvy earns a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases made through these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded.

MINIWARE DS213 pocket mixed-signal oscilloscope
Best Pocket Mixed-Signal Scope

MINIWARE DS213

4.0★★★★☆

A 129 g pocket scope with two analog and two digital channels plus a built-in signal generator.

FNIRSI DSO152 pocket digital oscilloscope
Best Budget

FNIRSI DSO152

4.1★★★★☆

A genuinely pocket-sized scope for quick diagnostics — not a bench replacement.

Specs side by side

MINIWARE DS213FNIRSI DSO152
Rating4.0★★★★☆4.1★★★★☆
Bandwidth15MHz (per Amazon listing)200kHz
Channels2 analog + 2 digital1
Sample rate100 MSa/s2.5 MSa/s
Best forA pocket scope with logic inputs and a signal sourceBasic diagnostics, learning the fundamentals
Display3-inch, 320 × 240 (per Amazon listing)2.8-inch, 320 × 240
Signal generatorSquare to 8 MHz; sine, triangle, sawtooth to 20 MHz; 3 VppNone
TriggersEdge, pulse, logic; Auto, Normal, Single, SlowAuto, Normal, Single
Input couplingAC/DCAC/DC
Vertical range (x1 probe)10 mV/div to 10 V/div10mV/div to 20V/div
Maximum input40 Vpp (x1), 400 Vpp (x10)40V (x1), 400V (x10)
Battery1000 mAh; runtime not stated by Miniware1000mAh, about 4 hours; USB-C charging
Size and weight99.5 × 58.5 × 13.5 mm, 129 g99 × 68.3 × 19.5 mm, 100 g
Comfortable signal range (3–5× rule)Up to roughly 3–5 MHzUp to roughly 40–65kHz

Specs checked against manufacturer documentation and official Amazon listings. Desk research, not bench testing. How we research.

Key differences

  • →Inputs: the DS213 has two analog and two digital channels; the DSO152 has one analog channel.
  • →Bandwidth: 15 MHz on the DS213 against 200kHz on the DSO152, 75 times higher. Miniware's own page doesn't state the DS213's bandwidth; the figure comes from its Amazon listing.
  • →Sample rate: 100 MSa/s on the DS213 against 2.5 MSa/s, 40 times faster. Miniware doesn't say how the rate divides with several channels on.
  • →Generator: the DS213 can output square waves to 8 MHz and sine, triangle and sawtooth waves to 20 MHz, in fixed steps; the DSO152 has no output.
  • →Triggering: Miniware lists edge, pulse and logic triggers for the DS213; FNIRSI lists Auto, Normal and Single trigger modes for the DSO152.
  • →Size: the DS213 is thinner (13.5 mm against 19.5 mm) and narrower, but at 129 g it weighs more than the 100 g DSO152.
  • →Sources: Miniware's website is offline, so the DS213's specs come from an archived copy of its product page plus its Amazon listing. FNIRSI publishes the DSO152's specs on a live page.
  • →Neither carries our Hands-on Tested badge; both assessments are desk research from published specs.

Spec by spec

On paper the DS213 is the more capable instrument by a wide margin, so the speed charts use a log scale. The physical charts are closer, and they don't all favor the same unit: the DS213 is slimmer, the DSO152 is lighter.

MINIWARE DS213
15 MHz
FNIRSI DSO152
200kHz

Bars use a logarithmic scale: each step is ten times the last.

Bandwidth, log scale. The DS213's 15 MHz is from its Amazon listing; Miniware's archived page gives none.
MINIWARE DS213
100 MSa/s
FNIRSI DSO152
2.5 MSa/s

Bars use a logarithmic scale: each step is ten times the last.

Real-time sample rate, log scale: 100 MSa/s is 40 times 2.5 MSa/s.
MINIWARE DS213
2 analog + 2 digital
FNIRSI DSO152
1 analog
Total inputs. The DS213's four are two analog plus two digital (logic-level) channels.
FNIRSI DSO152
19.5 mm, 100 g
MINIWARE DS213
13.5 mm, 129 g
Thickness per each maker. The DS213 is 6 mm slimmer, though 29 g heavier.

The sample-rate-to-bandwidth ratio is healthy on both: about 6.7 samples per cycle at the DS213's 15 MHz and 12.5 at the DSO152's 200kHz. In practice the DS213 draws a clean shape on signals up to a few MHz, and the DSO152 on signals up to a few tens of kHz. If you are unsure how the two specs relate, read what oscilloscope bandwidth means and what GSa/s means.

Which should you buy?

Buyer or jobPickOne-line reason
Testing an RC filter or small amplifier away from the benchMINIWARE DS213Its generator drives the circuit while CH A and CH B show input and output
First look at waveforms for a studentFNIRSI DSO152One channel, three trigger modes and a short menu to learn
Checking that a UART TX line toggles while watching a supply railMINIWARE DS213A digital channel for the logic line, an analog channel for the rail
Watching a slow sensor output over minutesFNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI lists a timebase up to 50s/div
Looking at a 1 MHz clock or an SPI clock lineMINIWARE DS213Inside its range; five times past the DSO152's bandwidth
Checking audio for clipping or a speaker line for humEitherBoth cover audio; the DSO152 is the simpler tool for it
Saving captures to a computer for a reportMINIWARE DS2138 MB built-in USB disk stores BMP, BUF and CSV files

What each one can and can't measure

Rated bandwidth is the frequency at which a sine wave shows about 30% smaller than it is. To see a waveform at close to its true size, buy three to five times its frequency, and more for square waves, whose shape depends on harmonics well above the fundamental.

MINIWARE DS213: a small mixed-signal kit

Taking the listed 15 MHz at face value, the DS213 suits signals up to about 3–5 MHz: microcontroller clocks at the low end, PWM, UART, I2C at 100kHz or 400kHz, audio and most hobby sensor outputs. Two analog channels let you measure delay or gain between two points, and the two digital channels add logic lines without spending an analog input, which suits a chip-select line against a data line. Logic triggering helps isolate one state of those lines; Miniware doesn't list protocol decoding, so you read the bits yourself. The limits are its 3-inch screen for four traces, 4K points per channel, which keeps long captures coarse, and specs you can't check on a live maker page.

FNIRSI DSO152: one slow channel, kept simple

At 200kHz, the DSO152 is comfortable up to roughly 40–65kHz. That covers sound, mains-derived signals on a transformer secondary, servo pulses, slow PWM and the ripple on a linear supply, which AC coupling and 10mV/div make easy to enlarge. Its 20V/div top range, twice the DS213's 10 V/div with a x1 probe, fits a large signal on screen at a glance, and its slowest timebase of 50s/div lets a drifting sensor crawl across the display. It can't compare two signals, has no logic inputs or output, and a 100kHz I2C clock is already past its comfortable range.

MINIWARE DS213GENABCDFilter oramp under testtwo logic lines,e.g. chip select + data2 analog + 2 digital + outputFNIRSI DSO1521 analog input, no output
A self-contained filter check on the DS213: its own output drives the circuit, channels A and B compare input and output, and C and D stay free for logic. The DSO152 can watch one point at a time.

That hookup is the clearest way to see the gap between the two. With the DS213, set the generator to one of its fixed sine steps, read the amplitude on A and B, then step to the next frequency; the ratio of the two traces is the filter's gain at that point. The DSO152 can only show one of those nodes, and it needs an outside source to drive the circuit in the first place.

A generator faster than its own scope

Miniware lists sine, triangle and sawtooth output up to 20 MHz, above the 15 MHz bandwidth on the DS213's Amazon listing, so its own inputs will show the top generator settings smaller than they are. The output also comes in fixed steps (20 for square, 11 for the other shapes) at a listed 3 Vpp, rather than any frequency you type in. That is fine for checking a filter at a handful of points or feeding a clock into a circuit, but it isn't a sweep generator for plotting a full frequency response.

Battery scopes and high voltage

Running on battery with the charging cable unplugged, neither scope is tied to mains earth, which makes them safer than a bench scope for some floating measurements. But the 400 V figures that both makers give with a x10 probe are input ranges, not safety ratings, and neither lists a CAT rating. For mains wiring, use a differential probe or a properly rated instrument, and don't charge either unit from a computer while probing, since that ties its ground to the computer's.

The trust question with the DS213

The DS213 is the stronger instrument on every figure Miniware publishes, but you buy it with less paperwork behind it. Miniware's site is offline, so its specs come from an archived copy of the official product page, and the two numbers most buyers look at first, bandwidth and screen size, appear only on the Amazon listing. The DSO152's numbers are all on FNIRSI's live page. If you need the DS213's extra channels and generator, that gap is a reasonable trade; if you only need to see one slow waveform, the DSO152 does that with every figure on its maker's page.

The DSO152 has more rivals compared on FNIRSI DSO-TC3 vs FNIRSI DSO152, OWON HDS2202S vs FNIRSI DSO152 and FNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek 6022BE. For handhelds with bigger screens, see HANMATEK HO52 vs OWON HDS272S; for the step to a bench scope, see Rigol DS1054Z vs FNIRSI DSO152, the beginner oscilloscope picks and the buying guide.

Choose the MINIWARE DS213 if…

  • ✓You want to compare two analog signals, such as a filter's input and output, on a pocket instrument
  • ✓You need to watch logic lines alongside an analog trace, using the two digital channels
  • ✓You want a signal source in the same case to drive the circuit you are measuring
  • ✓Your signals reach into the hundreds of kHz or low MHz

Choose the FNIRSI DSO152 if…

  • ✓You want the most basic, lowest-cost way to see what a signal looks like
  • ✓One channel is enough and your signals stay in the audio range or slower
  • ✓You prefer specs you can check on the maker's live product page
  • ✓You want USB-C charging and a battery FNIRSI rates for about 4 hours

Neither if…

You need to probe mains or another earth-referenced point: both run on battery with no CAT rating listed by either maker, and the 400 V x10-probe figures are input ranges, not safety ratings — use a differential probe or a properly rated instrument instead.

The bottom line

The MINIWARE DS213 is the better pocket instrument if you need more than one trace: two analog and two digital channels, 100 MSa/s and a built-in generator, though its 15 MHz bandwidth and screen size are stated only on Amazon. The FNIRSI DSO152 is the better pick for a first, simple look at slow signals: one channel, 200kHz, specs published on FNIRSI's live page and USB-C charging.

Frequently asked questions

Is the MINIWARE DS213 a logic analyzer?+

Partly. Besides its two analog channels it has two digital channels and Miniware lists a logic trigger, so you can watch two logic lines next to analog traces. That is far fewer lines than a dedicated logic analyzer, and Miniware doesn't list protocol decoding, so you read serial data from the waveform yourself. The FNIRSI DSO152 has no digital inputs.

What bandwidth does the MINIWARE DS213 have?+

Its Amazon listing gives 15 MHz. Miniware's own product page, now available only as an archived copy because the maker's site is offline, lists 100 MSa/s sampling but no bandwidth figure. Treat 15 MHz as the seller's stated figure. Even with some margin, it is many times the FNIRSI DSO152's 200kHz.

Can the DS213's signal generator test its own inputs?+

Yes, within limits. You can feed its output into CH A to see a known square or sine wave, a useful check that probes and settings are right. But Miniware lists sine output up to 20 MHz, above the 15 MHz bandwidth on the Amazon listing, so the highest settings will display smaller than they are. Frequencies come in fixed steps at 3 Vpp.

Which pocket scope is better for a complete beginner?+

The FNIRSI DSO152, if you mainly want to learn what waveforms look like. One channel and three trigger modes keep the menus short, and slow signals are where beginners usually start. Pick the DS213 if you already know you will compare two signals or look at logic lines, since the DSO152 can't grow into those jobs.

Which one is smaller to carry?+

They are almost the same length, about 99 mm. The DS213 is narrower and slimmer at 58.5 mm wide and 13.5 mm thick, against 68.3 mm and 19.5 mm for the DSO152. The DSO152 is lighter, 100 g against 129 g. Both fit a shirt pocket, so choose on channels and speed rather than size.

Related

See all beginner oscilloscope picksFNIRSI DSO152 reviewOscilloscope buying guideWhat is oscilloscope bandwidth?What does GSa/s mean?Hantek 1008B vs Hantek 6022BEFNIRSI 1013D Plus vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO2D15 vs FNIRSI 1014DHANMATEK HO52 vs OWON HDS272SHANMATEK DOS1102 vs Hantek DSO2C10FNIRSI 2C53T vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO2C10 vs FNIRSI 1014DPicoScope 2204A vs Hantek 6022BEFNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek 6022BEOWON HDS2202S vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI DSO-TC3 vs FNIRSI DSO152FNIRSI DSO152 vs Hantek DSO2D10FNIRSI DSO152 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1054Z vs FNIRSI DSO152Rigol DHO802 vs FNIRSI DSO152OWON VDS1022I vs Hantek 6022BEPicoScope 2206B vs Hantek 6022BEHantek 6022BE vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DS1054Z vs Hantek 6022BERigol DHO914 vs Rigol DHO804Rigol DHO914S vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1104Z-S Plus vs Siglent SDS1104X-EHantek DSO2C10 vs Hantek DSO2D10Hantek 2D72 vs FNIRSI 2C53TFNIRSI 1014D vs FNIRSI DSO-TC3Rigol DS1054Z vs OWON SDS1102Rigol DS1054Z vs OWON VDS1022IRigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DS1054Z vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DS1054Z vs Hantek DSO5102PRigol DHO802 vs Rigol DS1054ZRigol DHO802 vs Hantek DSO2D10Siglent SDS1104X-E vs Rigol DHO802Rigol DHO804 vs Rigol DS1054ZRigol DHO804 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ERigol DHO804 vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DHO804 vs Hantek DSO2D10Rigol DHO804 vs FNIRSI 1014DHantek DSO5102P vs Rigol DHO804Hantek DSO2D10 vs Siglent SDS1104X-ESiglent SDS1202X-E vs Hantek DSO2D10Siglent SDS1104X-E vs Hantek DSO5102PSiglent SDS1104X-E vs Siglent SDS1202X-ERigol DS1102Z-E vs Siglent SDS1102CML+PicoScope 2204A vs Digilent Analog Discovery 3FNIRSI DSO-510 vs FNIRSI DSO152

More oscilloscope guides and reviews

Product reviews

View all 4 reviews →